Mass. Decision Against Competition Reportedly Bad for Policyholders
The Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner’s decision to maintain the “fix-and-establish” rate-setting mechanism is bad news for most Massachusetts drivers, according to the American Insurance Association (AIA).
“The ‘fix-and-establish’ system is simply government price fixing,” said Paul Moran, AIA vice president, northeast region. “The result is that consumers have few choices among the small number of insurers doing business in the state. Many consumers are paying much higher than needed premiums to subsidize riskier drivers under this system.”
In the decision, the commissioner does not reportedly allow companies to offer “optional endorsements” for enhanced rental car or towing coverage options.
“Even refusing to take a tiny step toward competition through the allowance of ‘optional endorsements’ needlessly limits consumer choice in auto insurance coverage. This decision simply maintains the status quo of a very bad system where good drivers are forced to subsidize high-risk drivers,” concluded Moran.
- McKinsey in Talks to Pay More Than $600M to Resolve Probe, Sources Say
- Florida Citizens’ Brass Tired of ‘Clickbait’ News on its Hurricane Claims Denials
- Blacks and Hispanics Pay More for Auto Insurance. Study Tries to Answer Why.
- Gunmaker Sig Sauer Must Pay $11 Million Over Pistol That Fired Accidentally