Mass. Decision Against Competition Reportedly Bad for Policyholders
The Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner’s decision to maintain the “fix-and-establish” rate-setting mechanism is bad news for most Massachusetts drivers, according to the American Insurance Association (AIA).
“The ‘fix-and-establish’ system is simply government price fixing,” said Paul Moran, AIA vice president, northeast region. “The result is that consumers have few choices among the small number of insurers doing business in the state. Many consumers are paying much higher than needed premiums to subsidize riskier drivers under this system.”
In the decision, the commissioner does not reportedly allow companies to offer “optional endorsements” for enhanced rental car or towing coverage options.
“Even refusing to take a tiny step toward competition through the allowance of ‘optional endorsements’ needlessly limits consumer choice in auto insurance coverage. This decision simply maintains the status quo of a very bad system where good drivers are forced to subsidize high-risk drivers,” concluded Moran.
- CommScope Sued by Lenders for at Least $150 Million Over Alleged Breach
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- Openly’s Tech-Forward Approach Includes AI in Claims
- The Big Dog Is Off the Tech Porch: State Farm as ‘Next Gen Good Neighbor’
- A 16,000% Problem: Why Workers’ Comp Can’t Get Drug Costs Under Control
- LA Fire Suspect Angry About No Date for New Year’s, Prosecutors Say
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- Florida Woman Drives Elevated Pickup Over Lamborghini Sports Car in Parking Lot