Pa. Supreme Court OKs Roving Drunk Driving Road Stops by Police
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that roving checks for drivers under the influence of alcohol are legal.
The ruling upheld the 2003 conviction of Greg Beaman, of Pittsburgh, who was stopped by Pittsburgh police in 2001. He appealed his conviction, claiming that the roving stops, which are a variant on DUI checkpoints, amounted to an unreasonable search.
The Supreme Court agreed with a Superior Court ruling that upheld the roving stops. The lower court found such stops were not unreasonable.
The roving stops rely in part on an officer’s suspicion that a driver is under the influence. In checkpoints, all drivers on a chosen roadway are given at least a cursory observation by trained officers.
Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
- NHTSA Expands Probe into 1.3M Ford F-150 Pickups Over Transmission Issues
- Canceled FEMA Review Council Vote Leaves Flood Insurance Reforms in Limbo
- Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims
- Portugal Rolls Out $2.9 Billion Aid as Deadly Flooding Spreads
- Adjusters Launch ‘CarFax for Insurance Claims’ to Vet Carriers’ Damage Estimates
- What The Return of California’s ‘Death Discount’ Means for Litigation
- FM Using AI to Elevate Claims to Deliver More Than Just Cost Savings
- Nationwide Spending $100M on AI to Beef up Claims Efficiency, Customer Experience