Va. Court Reinstates Jury Award for Food Poisoning
A Roanoke judge should not have thrown out an award of more than $110,000 to a woman who suffered food poisoning from a restaurant meal of beef tips and rice, the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled.
The high court reinstated Susie Bussey’s verdict against a Golden Corral in Roanoke. Last year, a jury found the restaurant negligent and awarded Bussey $111,765.25.
Evidence showed that Bussey became ill after eating lunch at the restaurant in March 2002. Bussey noticed at the time that the beef she was served smelled bad, the Supreme Court noted, and the manager confirmed that it was “no good.”
Although Bussey stopped eating, she spent four days in the hospital with what her doctor testified was food poisoning. The ailment aggravated Bussey’s pre-existing blood disorder and caused health problems that eventually forced her to quit her job as a hospital housekeeper, the jury was told.
But Circuit Judge Charlie Dorsey later threw out the verdict, ruling that testimony from the doctor and other witnesses was insufficient. In reversing that decision, the Supreme Court found the evidence to be “neither speculative nor scant.”
- Florida’s Home Insurance Industry May Be Worse Than Anyone Realizes
- Jury Awards $80M to 3 Former Zurich NA Employees for Wrongful Termination
- Report: Claims Handlers Embracing Technology
- Work Safety Group Releases List of ‘Dirty Dozen’ Employers
- Millions of Recalled Hyundai and Kia Vehicles, With Dangerous Defect, Remain on Road
- Mother of 8-Year-Old ‘Violently Sucked’ into Houston Hotel Pool Files Wrongful Death Suit
- California Chiropractor Sentenced to 54 Years for $150M Workers’ Comp Scheme
- Report: Vehicle Complexity, Labor ‘Reshaping’ Auto Insurance and Collision Repair