Pennsylvania Court Sides With Providers on Malpractice Fund
A state court is siding with hospitals and doctors in a case involving unspent balances in Pennsylvania’s supplemental medical malpractice insurance fund.
In a five-to-two ruling made public Monday, Commonwealth Court overruled state Insurance Commissioner Michael Consedine and ordered him to recalculate assessments levied on healthcare providers for the years 2009, 2010 and 2011.
At issue is whether state officials should have included accrued balances in the so-called MCare fund when calculating the annual assessments. The state contends that those balances – which totaled $104 million in 2008 – should be excluded from the assessment formula.
But the court concluded that the law clearly intended for such balances to be part of the calculation – resulting in lower assessments on providers.
The department declined to comment on the ruling.
- Before the Nuclear Verdict: Rethinking How Liability Claims Are Managed
- Warren, Hawley Press Insurers Over Closed, Unpaid Claims
- Report: Property Claims Face Delays, Are Growing More Complex
- Don’t Sweat the Heatwave, El Niño Is Cooking up Some Raucous Weather for California
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country
- Florida Bans Flock Cameras, License Plate Readers From State Roads
- Severe Convective Storms: Risk, Field Reality and the Path to Resilience