Maryland Dog Bite Legislation Debate Continues
A new Senate bill would hold dog owners liable when their dogs bite “innocent victims,” but would also relieve owners who prove they couldn’t know their dogs were dangerous.
This marks the General Assembly’s third consecutive attempt to revise its dog bite policy. It aims for a compromise between the strict liability bills favored by the Senate and more lenient ones approved by the House.
However, Sen. Robert Zirkin, a Baltimore County Democrat who litigates dog-bite cases on behalf of plaintiffs, argued Thursday that the new bill leaves the burden solely on victims to prove the dogs were violent. He said it amounts to a “one free bite” policy.
Zirkin has introduced a counter-proposal, Senate Bill 286, that closely resembles the bill the House of Delegates rejected last year.
- Warren, Hawley Press Insurers Over Closed, Unpaid Claims
- Don’t Sweat the Heatwave, El Niño Is Cooking up Some Raucous Weather for California
- Anxiety Over Gas Prices Points to ‘Looming EV Comeback’ in US
- First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
- Severe Convective Storms: Risk, Field Reality and the Path to Resilience
- Apollo’s Rowan Blasts Regulators for Handling of Walter Insurers
- Londoners Find ‘Horrendous’ Cracks in Their Homes After Successive Heat Waves
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country