United Baggage Handlers’ Stress Injury Suit Settled
United Airlines has reached a settlement in a lawsuit over the working conditions for baggage handlers, the U.S. Department of Labor announced Tuesday.
The lawsuit was filed after inspectors found baggage handlers at Newark Liberty International Airport often were forced to lift heavy bags or perform other functions while leaning over, twisting or reaching overhead.
The Labor Department said United baggage handlers reported more than 600 musculoskeletal injuries between 2011 and early 2015.
Inspectors found that employees had to repeatedly bend over vertical posts to reach items on conveyor belts, manually load and unload gate-checked bags at passenger jet bridges and spend prolonged periods loading and unloading baggage in confined areas of planes’ cargo bays.
As part of the settlement, United agreed to install conveyor belts on jet bridges. The airline also will retain an expert on repetitive stress injuries to evaluate injury risks, and will adopt the expert’s recommendations.
A spokesman for Chicago, Illinois-based United didn’t return a message seeking comment Tuesday.
United has 90 days to complete the expert’s evaluation and two years to implement its recommendations, under terms of the settlement.
“This settlement will have long-term safety implications for the baggage-handling industry,” said Jeffrey Rogoff, the Labor Department’s regional solicitor in New York. “As one of the world’s leading airlines, United Airlines is setting a workplace safety standard that other airlines will be compelled to follow.”
- Car Owners Shocked by $200 Gas Bills Finally Embrace Used EVs
- The Future of Appraisal and the Rising Standard of Competency
- The Field Inspection Gap: A Growing Structural Risk in Claims Handling
- Merck to Settle Bulk of Gardasil Suits for About $50 Million
- Trump Files Fresh $10 Billion Suit Over WSJ’s Epstein Story
- Why Toyota RAV4s Are Suddenly the Most Coveted Used Cars in America
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference