Ohio’s Top Court: Subrogation Law Unconstitutional
The Ohio subrogation law that requires employees to reimburse their employers for their workers’ compensation benefits expenses if they win a work-related, third-party lawsuit was ruled unconstitutional by the state’s supreme court last week.
The top court upheld a trial court ruling which said that Ohio’s subrogation law is unfair and discriminatory because plaintiffs who settle out of court aren’t required to reimburse employers, but plaintiffs who receive an award after winning in court are so obligated.
An appeals court affirmed the decision before it wound up before the Ohio Supreme Court, whose insurance-related decisions in recent years have been a matter of great concern to the industry. The decision applies to workers’ comp claims filed before a change in the law went into effect April 9, 2003.
- DraftKings Sued Over ‘Risk-Free’ Bets That Were Anything But
- Jury Awards $80M to 3 Former Zurich NA Employees for Wrongful Termination
- Beyond the Claim: How Social Canvassing is Transforming Insurance Fraud Detection
- California Sees Two More Property Insurers Withdraw From Market
- Poll: Consumers OK with AI in P/C Insurance, but Not So Much for Claims and Underwriting
- Millions of Recalled Hyundai and Kia Vehicles, With Dangerous Defect, Remain on Road
- California Chiropractor Sentenced to 54 Years for $150M Workers’ Comp Scheme
- EVs Head for Junkyard as Mechanic Shortage Inflates Repair Costs