Minnesota Appeals Court Reverses Cirrus Case Award
The Minnesota Court of Appeals says Duluth-based Cirrus Design did not have a duty to provide pilot training to a Grand Rapids man whose plane crashed in 2003, killing him and his passenger.
The opinion published Tuesday essentially vacates a more than $16 million award for families of the victims.
Pilot Gary Prokop and his passenger, James Kosak, died Jan. 18, 2003. The families sued, alleging Cirrus and the University of North Dakota Aerospace Foundation didn’t provide adequate pilot training.
While companies are supposed to warn of product dangers, the appeals court says Cirrus didn’t have an obligation to train Prokop.
One judge disagreed, saying Cirrus made the training part of its purchase agreement, so voluntarily assumed a duty to provide it.
Attorneys for victims’ families intend to appeal.
- Work Safety Group Releases List of ‘Dirty Dozen’ Employers
- Warren Buffett’s PacifiCorp Now Faces $30 Billion Fire Claim Demand
- Growing Progressive Set to Hire 10,000 for Claims, IT, Other Roles
- Insurers Get Green Light to Pay Less Than Billed Charges in Florida PIP Cases