Insurers Win Michigan Supreme Court Case Over Rogue Drivers
The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled in favor of insurance companies in two cases that involve drivers who crashed cars when they didn’t have the owners’ permission to get behind the wheel.
The court’s Republican majority said Tuesday the drivers don’t qualify for insurance benefits, even if they weren’t stealing the cars.
The court ruled in a case from Kent County where a man crashed his father’s car. Craig Smith Jr.’s girlfriend was driving but he talked her into letting him take over, despite not having a license.
A second case from Ottawa County involved a man who was excluded from his wife’s insurance policy. He drove the car anyway and crashed.
The Supreme Court overruled decisions by the state appeals court, which said the drivers were eligible for benefits.
- Don’t Sweat the Heatwave, El Niño Is Cooking up Some Raucous Weather for California
- Will California’s New Smoke Claims Law Create a Recovery Bottleneck?
- Warren, Hawley Press Insurers Over Closed, Unpaid Claims
- First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
- Torrential Rain Brings Deadly Floods Back to East Coast of Spain
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Are We Training Claims Adjusters or Claims Processors?