Michigan Court Says Insurer Doesn’t Have to Buy Van
An insurance company that refused to pay for a van for a disabled man has won an appeal at the Michigan Supreme Court.
Auto-Owners Insurance says it agreed to pay for modifications to the van so Ken Admire could travel with his wheelchair. But it told the Ingham County man in 2007 that it would no longer pay for an entire vehicle because of a change in Michigan law.
That left Admire with an out-of-pocket cost of $18,000. He was severely injured years ago when his motorcycle was struck by a car.
In a 4-1 decision, the Supreme Court says the cost of a van is an expense that Admire would have faced regardless of his injuries. Republican justices say the need for transportation didn’t change because of his accident.
Copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Today
- Recovery Starts Before the Loss: What Claims Professionals Know About Severe Weather Preparedness
- Hackers Tricked Asos Employee to Steal Work Account Login
- Business Interruption Claims Are Approaching $1M Average
- Apple-OpenAI Judge Says He’s ‘Likely’ to Side With iPhone Maker
Popular This Month
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country
- Severe Convective Storms: Risk, Field Reality and the Path to Resilience
- Florida Bans Flock Cameras, License Plate Readers From State Roads
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States