Fear No Defense Against License Revocation in Minnesota
The Minnesota Court of Appeals says fear of harm is not a defense against losing one’s driver’s license for drunken driving.
The case involved a Monticello couple who got into a drunken argument at a Mora resort that turned physical back at their family cabin. After Jennifer Axelberg took refuge in her car, Jason Axelberg punched the windshield. Fearing for her safety, she drove back to the resort where a bystander called police. He was arrested on suspicion of domestic assault while she was arrested on suspicion of driving while impaired. The state revoked her license for a year.
In a 2-1 ruling, the appeals court said state law has never recognized the “necessity defense” against a driver’s license revocation for drunken driving.
Jennifer Axelberg’s attorney, Ryan Pacyga, tells Minnesota Public Radio News he will petition the Minnesota Supreme Court to review the case.
- HSBC Executive Strikes Back in Court Fight Over Poaching Claims
- Hurricane Isaias Reaches Category 3 as It Nears Florida, Alabama
- Before the Nuclear Verdict: Rethinking How Liability Claims Are Managed
- Goldman Sachs Ensnared in EY Data Breach Earlier This Year
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Severe Convective Storms: Risk, Field Reality and the Path to Resilience
- New Corgi, Liberate, VERVE Claims Tech. Do We Need New Acronyms?
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country