Kansas Judge Says Test in DUI Case Can Be Suppressed
A Douglas County judge has ruled that a blood test from a DUI case in Lawrence, Kansas, will be suppressed, rejecting the state’s argument that the test was lawful.
Douglas County District Judge Kay Huff granted Julian M. Kuszmaul’s motion to suppress the results of a blood test, The Lawrence Journal-World reported Tuesday.
Kuszmaul is awaiting trial on four misdemeanor charges after an accident in August 2012 that forced doctors to amputate the legs of Colby Liston, who was struck by the car Kuszmaul was driving. Liston was standing behind a parked car when he was hit, pinning him to the vehicle.
Kuszmaul refused to consent to a blood test but had his blood drawn at a hospital. The test results showed Kuszmaul’s blood-alcohol was 0.25, three times the legal limit of 0.08, at the time of the accident.
The state argued that the implied consent statute made the blood test lawful.
But Huff ruled that officers should have obtained a search warrant before Kuszmaul’s blood was drawn. Huff said the statute does not establish clearly defined authorization of warrantless blood draws in the event of accident or injury, and said meeting the statute requirements does not necessarily satisfy the Fourth Amendment.
Kuszmaul is scheduled to appear in court Oct. 22, when a trial date is expected to be set.
- Goldman Sachs Ensnared in EY Data Breach Earlier This Year
- Don’t Sweat the Heatwave, El NiƱo Is Cooking up Some Raucous Weather for California
- HSBC Executive Strikes Back in Court Fight Over Poaching Claims
- First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Severe Convective Storms: Risk, Field Reality and the Path to Resilience
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States