Wildfire Expert Warns Against July 3 Mount Rushmore Fireworks Show
A July 3 fireworks display planned at the Mount Rushmore National Memorial would be “ill advised” because of the abnormally dry conditions and risk of summer wildfires, a fire expert said.
The event could attract as many as 7,500 people, and President Donald Trump said he plans to attend.
Bill Gabbert, the former fire management officer for Mount Rushmore and six other national parks in the region, said shooting fireworks over the extremely flammable ponderosa pine forest should not be done.
“Burning debris, the burning embers and unexploded shells fall into a ponderosa pine forest and ponderosa pine is extremely flammable,” said Gabbert.
The Black Hills fell 30% to 50% short of moisture compared to the long-term precipitation average for the region in April and May, the Rapid City Journal reported. Long-range forecasts for June indicate that hotter and drier-than-average conditions will continue until July.
The U.S. Drought Monitor recently labeled nearly all of southwestern South Dakota, including most of the Black Hills, as “abnormally dry.”
The fireworks display at Mount Rushmore to celebrate Independence Day has not happened since 2009, when it was ended because of fire danger after a pine beetle infestation.
The National Park Service, which manages the memorial, has determined that launching fireworks at Mount Rushmore would pose only a slight fire risk.
Republican Gov. Kristi Noem’s communications director, Ian Fury, said the park service has taken several precautions, including performing an environmental assessment and conducting a large controlled burn within the memorial’s borders in April.
- The Field Inspection Gap: A Growing Structural Risk in Claims Handling
- Car Owners Shocked by $200 Gas Bills Finally Embrace Used EVs
- US, Mexico, Canada to Miss July USMCA Date, Ramping Up Trade Tension
- Trump Will Ask Supreme Court to Revive $475 Million CNN Suit
- Why Toyota RAV4s Are Suddenly the Most Coveted Used Cars in America
- Jefferies Sued by Fund Investors Alleging Water Firm Fraud
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference