BP’s Partners Will Not Set Up Gulf Oil Claims Fund
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and MOEX, a unit of Japan’s Mitsui & Co., said they do not need to create a special fund to deal with spill-related costs because BP had a 65 percent interest in the well and was its exclusive operator.
“We have not set money aside,” Anadarko Chairman James Hackett told a Senate subcommittee looking into the oil spill. “We are not paying.”
Naoki Ishii, president of MOEX, said his company “has no established fund” to cover cleanup costs or liability claims they may be ordered to pay relating to the spill.
Anadarko owns 25 percent of the project and MOEX has 10 percent.
At the urging of the White House, BP set up a $20 billion fund to pay future liability claims for lost income from businesses and workers due to the spill and other costs.
Lawmakers rebuked Anadarko and MOEX for failing to set up their own funds.
“You look like you’re not stepping up,” said Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill.
“Right now the people who are in the Gulf need the money, not the litigation,” said Republican Senator John McCain.
Hackett said under their joint operating agreement with BP, “no party is required to pay any costs or damages to the operator to the extend that they are incurred as a result of the operator’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.”
Lawmakers shot back that nobody was asking Anadarko or MOEX to pay anything, but to begin setting aside some money in case a court finds the companies liable.
(Reporting by Tom Doggett; Editing by David Gregorio)
- Roblox Wants Deluge of Child Sex Abuse Cases Moved Out of Court
- Report: Extreme Weather to Drive $20 Trillion in Spending
- PE Founder Constantino Ran Firm in ‘Drunken Haze,’ Ex-COO Says in Lawsuit
- Revlon Fails to Ensure Some Products Are Safe, FDA Warns
- Why Toyota RAV4s Are Suddenly the Most Coveted Used Cars in America
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference
- Ex-Shield AI Worker Sues Over ‘Profane, Egregious’ Acts by Senior Official
- The Field Inspection Gap: A Growing Structural Risk in Claims Handling