Homeowners’ Madoff Claims Not Covered Under AIG Policy: Judge
Two California residents, Robert and Harlene Horowitz, had alleged $8.5 million of losses in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, reflecting the amount on their final account statement before the fraud was revealed in December 2008.
They said this entitled them to the maximum $30,000 payout under their AIG Fraud SafeGuard protection in their policy. They sought class-action status on behalf of potentially thousands of policyholders.
AIG contended it should pay nothing because the Horowitzes withdrew $226,000 more from Madoff’s firm than they put in.
U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty agreed, citing a ruling by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland, who oversees the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.
Lifland in March said it would be “absurd” to credit former clients for the bogus amounts shown on the account statements.
He agreed with Irving Picard, the court-appointed trustee for Madoff’s firm, that losses should be based on how much clients invested with Madoff and how much they withdrew.
Crotty said the sum on the final account statement “was not taken from the plaintiffs by fraud; rather, it never belonged to them, or even existed, in the first place due to fraud.”
Brad Friedman, a partner at Milberg LLP representing the Horowitzes, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
Madoff, 72, is serving a 150-year sentence in a North Carolina federal prison after admitting in March 2009 to running what prosecutors called a $65 billion Ponzi scheme.
The case is Horowitz v. American International Group Inc. et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-07312.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Gary Hill)
- Iran Starts Bitcoin-Backed Ship Insurance for Hormuz Strait
- Verisk Report Shows Drop in US Reconstruction Costs in 2Q
- Odey Settles Sexual Assault Cases Ahead of London Trial
- Adapting Claim Investigations for AI-Driven Fraud
- Hail to High Variance: Rethinking Test Squares and Roof Damage Assessment
- CommScope Sued by Lenders for at Least $150 Million Over Alleged Breach
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- AI Ruling Prompts Warnings From Lawyers: Your Chats Could Be Used Against You