Tips on Investigating Subrogation Claims Involving Adjacent Property Owners

Subrogating claims caused by adjacent property owners can be tricky, according to Michael Wallace, a season property subrogation attorney with New Jersey-based Stutman Law and Mark Suchecki, a consulting engineer with Plick & Associates.

Wallace and Suchecki recently presented on the subject at the Property & Liability Resource Bureau’s national conference in Indianapolis.

According to Suchecki, one of the most common causes of property damage from adjacent properties is foundation undermining associated with earth movement, such as excavation and vibration. Another common cause of damage is related to installation of deep foundations caused by pile driving. Demolition of a neighboring building causing it to collapse can also cause damage, such as punctures and cracks in walls. Even debris removal and rebuilding can lead to property damage to neighboring buildings. In these types of situations, Wallace said there could be two claims and two occurrences.

Though OSHA regulations do exist relating to demolitions near adjacent properties, the rules aren’t always followed. An example, the Philadelphia building demolition that led to the collapse of a neighboring thrift shop that killed six people.

According to Wallace, some obstacles to investigating these types of losses include:

• The cause of loss occurred on adjacent property controlled by others.
• Denial of access to the property that caused the loss.
• Safety concerns and demolition orders.
• Risk of additional damage that could occur.
• The need for emergent applications to be filed in court.

In order to overcome these obstacles, Wallace recommended engaging in a thorough investigation. He offered the following steps to investigating adjacent property subrogation claims:

The subrogation attorney noted that OSHA reports are usually comprehensive, containing statements of contractors and employees, photos, building documents and violations, if assessed. While OSHA reports are admissible, the federal agency is protected from testifying on civil matters.

Wallace recommended proactive claims handling. He suggested adjusters consider doing the following:

• Develop a protocol to secure scene for inspection.
• Develop a protocol for joint inspection.
• Draft release of claims/assumption of risk document ahead of time.
• Consider improving scenes by developing a shoring/bracing/security fencing plan with an expert.

If demolition is ordered, Wallace recommended making a plea to local government officials for access to the site. If unlikely, he said adjusters should consider alternative ways to investigate the loss via photos from the adjacent insured building, obtaining photos from a raised construction bucket or even using security camera footage.