AstraZeneca Refused to Pay Full Bonus to US Remote Worker, Lawsuit Claims
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP has been sued in the U.S. by a former senior director who claims the drugmaker refused to pay her nearly $130,000 in promised bonuses and stock options because she worked from home full-time.
Instead, AstraZeneca earlier this year cut her payout in half and refused to grant any stock options because she did not come into the office at least three days per week, according to the lawsuit.
AstraZeneca, which is based in London and has U.S. headquarters in Delaware, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The lawsuit claims AstraZeneca gave no prior notice that it would condition bonuses on whether employees reported to the office.
Companies in employment agreements often reserve the right to exercise discretion in awarding bonuses.
Bodes accused AstraZeneca of breach of contract and failure to pay wages in violation of South Carolina law. She is seeking to recoup the money she claims she is owed along with other damages.
The lawsuit is the latest to stem from the explosion of remote work that began during the COVID-19 pandemic, though most of the litigation involves claims that companies refused to cover expenses related to working from home or that workers with disabilities were unable to return to the office.
In March, a California federal judge refused to allow an Amazon.com employee to pursue claims on behalf of nearly 7,000 other workers that the online retailer did not cover home office expenses. The judge said the plaintiff failed to identify a company-wide policy of not reimbursing employees for those costs, noting that at least 600 workers were reimbursed.
- Texas CEO and His 2 Children Were Among 4 Killed in Wreck Before Thanksgiving
- Illinois Supreme Rules UM Insurance Can’t Be Restricted to Occupants of Covered Vehicles
- Florida Hospital Alleges Juror Misconduct, Wants New Trial After Verdict in Maya Case
- P/C Insurers Face Challenging Claims Dynamics as Frequency, Severity Rise: Swiss Re
- N.Y. No-Fault Fraudster Pleads Guilty, Agrees to Pay $40M in Restitution
- Hawaii Supreme Court Rules Insurers Can’t Recoup Defense Costs from Insureds
- Ohio Court Cites Wording of Exception to Exclusion in Reviving Dog Bite Claim
- Dash Cams in Fleet Vehicles are Key to Avoiding Nuclear Verdicts, Risk Managers Say