Pilgrim’s Pride Agrees to $100M Settlement Over Chicken Farmers’ Pay
Pilgrim’s Pride, one of the largest U.S. poultry processors, agreed to pay $100 million to settle claims it conspired with rivals to underpay chicken farmers, the final and by far the largest settlement in the seven-year-old antitrust case.
The litigation addressed accusations that large poultry producers conspired to keep farmers’ pay artificially low, by sharing confidential information about compensation and by agreeing not to actively recruit each others’ farmers.
Pilgrim’s Pride is the last remaining defendant. If its settlement is approved, the total recovery will be $169 million, minus legal fees and other expenses.
Tyson Foods, Sanderson Farms, Koch Foods and Perdue Foods previously settled for $21 million, $17.75 million, $15.5 million and $14.75 million, respectively.
Pilgrim’s Pride, based in Greeley, Colorado, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Gary Smith, a lawyer for the farmers, called the settlement an “outstanding” result that he believed was the largest antitrust settlement by any meatpacker or poultry processor.
The settlement covers a certified class of 24,354 so-called growers from Jan. 27, 2013, through Dec. 31, 2019, court papers show.
Growers provide land, labor and equipment to raise chickens until the animals are ready for slaughter, and then return the animals to poultry producers.
The case is In re: Broiler Chicken Grower Antitrust Litigation (No. II), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma, No. 20-md-02977.
- How Big Was the Cat? Investigator Warns About Claims of Clogged Toilets
- Estimates Put U.S. Damage and Loss from Francine at $9B with $1.5B in Insured Losses
- Former NFL Player’s $43.5 Million Score in Medical Malpractice Case Upheld
- U.S. Regulators Aim to Force Recall of 51 Million Car Air Bags
- U.S. Nuclear Verdicts Break Records and Drive Social Inflation to 7% in 2023, Report Shows
- Disney Drops Bid to Have Allergy-Death Lawsuit Tossed Because Plaintiff Signed Up For Disney+
- Underwriters Wary of PFAS Amid ‘Superstorm’ of Litigation, Regulation
- Disney Argues Wrongful Death Suit Should Be Tossed Because Plaintiff Signed Up For a Disney+ Trial