Texas Attorney General Sues Insulin Makers and Pharmacy Middlemen Over High Costs
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office said on Thursday it had sued insulin makers Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi.
The office had also sued PBMs, including CVS’ Caremark, Cigna’s Express Scripts, and UnitedHealth’s OptumRx, who act as intermediaries in negotiating drug prices and coverage.
Why It’s Important
The lawsuit targets both insulin manufacturers and PBMs. The previous action by U.S. antitrust regulators only targeted PBMs.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, in September, sued the same PBMs, accusing them of steering diabetes patients towards higher-priced insulin in order to secure millions of dollars in rebates from pharmaceutical companies.
At that time, the FTC had not sued the insulin manufacturers, but had criticized their role in what it called a broken system.
Context
In the Texas lawsuit, Paxton accused that manufacturers artificially raised the prices of insulin and then paid a significant, undisclosed portion back to the PBMs for preferential treatment in return.
The PBMs subsequently awarded preferred status to the manufacturer with the highest list prices, while excluding lower-priced drugs, the press release from the attorney general’s office said.
Key Quote
“Big Pharma insulin manufacturers and PBMs worked together to take advantage of diabetes patients and drive prices as high as they could,” said Paxton.
“Allegations that we play any role in determining the prices charged by manufacturers for their products are false, and we intend to vigorously defend against this baseless suit,” CVS said in an emailed statement.
“This lawsuit is without merit and ignores the reality of the current market,” UnitedHealth’s OptumRx said.
While Cigna did not provide a direct comment, the company redirected Reuters to its Sept. 20 statement, where it said the action filed by the FTC related to insulin pricing is demonstrably baseless.
“Novo Nordisk believes that the allegations in the lawsuit are meritless, and we intend to vigorously defend against these claims,” a company spokesperson told Reuters.
“While we will not comment on the specifics of the allegations, Sanofi’s pricing practices have always complied with the law,” the French drugmaker said in an emailed statement.
Lilly did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
(Reporting by Singh and Sunny in Bengaluru; Editing by Mohammed Safi Shamsi)
- Mississippi High Court Tells USAA to Pay up in Hurricane Katrina Bad-Faith Claim
- Coming Soon to Florida: New State-Fed Program to Elevate Homes in Flood Zones
- Report: Wearable Technology May Help Workers’ Comp Insurers Reduce Claims
- AccuWeather’s 2024 White Christmas Forecast Calls for Snow in More Areas