Alibaba to Pay $433.5M to Settle Shareholder Suit Over Monopoly Claims
Alibaba denied wrongdoing, saying it entered the settlement to avoid the cost and disruption of further litigation.
The proposed settlement was filed in federal court in Manhattan and requires the approval of U.S. District Judge George Daniels.
The lawsuit, filed in 2020, alleged that Alibaba claimed it did not violate anti-monopoly or unfair competition laws, despite requiring merchants to choose only one distribution platform.
The settlement covers investors in Alibaba’s American depositary shares from Nov. 13, 2019, to Dec. 23, 2020, and resolves claims they suffered losses when the market recognized Alibaba’s misleading statements and the stock price fell.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs in court papers called the proposed deal “an exceptional result,” saying it vastly exceeded the median recovery in securities class actions where the investor losses exceeded $10 billion.
The maximum damages award the Alibaba investors could have potentially sought had they continued litigating was $11.63 billion, the lawyers wrote.
The case is in re Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-09568.
(Reporting by Surbhi Misra in Bengaluru and Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by William Mallard)
- First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
- Before the Nuclear Verdict: Rethinking How Liability Claims Are Managed
- Warren, Hawley Press Insurers Over Closed, Unpaid Claims
- HSBC Executive Strikes Back in Court Fight Over Poaching Claims
- Torrential Rain Brings Deadly Floods Back to East Coast of Spain
- Severe Convective Storms: Risk, Field Reality and the Path to Resilience
- Apollo’s Rowan Blasts Regulators for Handling of Walter Insurers
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage