GM Agrees to 5-Year Ban on Selling Drivers’ Location Data
The agency alleged the largest U.S. automaker collected, used, and sold drivers’ precise geolocation data and driving behavior information from millions of vehicles, which can be used to set insurance rates, without notifying consumers and obtaining consent.
Related: Texas Lawsuit Alleges Allstate Illegally Collects Driver Data
The vehicles automatically collected data on hard braking, late night driving, and speeding and sold that data to consumer reporting agencies without permission from drivers. The agencies used the data to compile reports that insurance companies then sometimes used to deny insurance and in some cases raise rates.
GM said in a statement that it had ended its Smart Driver program last year. It had designed the program hoping to promote safe driving by analyzing and giving drivers feedback on their driving habits.
Related: Suit Says OnStar, LexisNexis Shared Driving Data with Insurers, Spiking Rates
“We’re more committed than ever to making our policies and controls clear and accessible as we continue to evolve the driving experience for our customers,” GM said.
The company must also obtain driver consent to collect data, and allow them to delete or limit data as part of the settlement.
The case is one of several the Democratic-led FTC was releasing ahead of President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday.
The FTC’s two Republican commissioners did not vote.
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat, praised the settlement to “protect Americans’ privacy against automakers who sold detailed location data to insurance companies.”
(Reporting by Singh in Washington and Godoy in California and Shepardson; Editing by David Gregorio)
- Merck to Settle Bulk of Gardasil Suits for About $50 Million
- PE Founder Constantino Ran Firm in ‘Drunken Haze,’ Ex-COO Says in Lawsuit
- Revlon Fails to Ensure Some Products Are Safe, FDA Warns
- Ex-Shield AI Worker Sues Over ‘Profane, Egregious’ Acts by Senior Official
- The Adjuster’s Year Ahead: What AI Will and Won’t Change About the Job
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- JPMorgan Denies Ex-VP’s Viral Harassment Claims in Court Filing