Uber Lawsuit Accuses DoorDash of Anticompetitive Practices
In a filing in California Superior Court in San Francisco on Friday, Uber accused DoorDash of coercing restaurants into using DoorDash as their exclusive or sole preferred provider for delivery.
“DoorDash’s underhanded tactics have cost Uber millions of dollars in revenue and unlawfully restricted its ability to grow Uber Direct, the Uber Eats platform for first-party delivery,” Uber said in the lawsuit, first reported by the Wall Street Journal late Friday.
“Uber’s case has no merit. Their claims are unfounded and based on their inability to offer merchants, consumers, or couriers a quality alternative,” a DoorDash spokesperson said in an emailed statement to Reuters.
Uber did not immediately respond to a Reuters’ request for comment.
(Reporting by Rajan in Bengaluru; editing by Diane Craft)
- Barge Looted in the Bahamas Returns to Florida but Insurance Claims Mounting
- Businessman, Former Federal Insurance Co. Attorney Hit With $50M Verdict
- State Farm Sued Over Policies Backed by Distressed Insurer PHL
- Judge Rules Bristol Myers Must Face $6.7B Lawsuit Over Delayed Cancer Drug