California Commissioner Takes Legal Action Against FAIR Plan for Smoke Damage Claims
California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara is taking legal action against the California FAIR Plan Association for reportedly denying and limiting smoke damage claims from wildfire survivors.
The California Department of Insurance filed an order to show cause against the FAIR Plan after receiving consumer complaints smoke damage claims denials the CDI says was based on FAIR Plan-defined requirement for “permanent physical damage.”
Related: California Surplus Lines Take-Up Soars as Brokers Work to Find Coverage for Clients
The legal filing builds on a multi-year investigation, which the CDI said uncovered at least 418 violations of California’s consumer protection laws.
In an unrelated matter, the CDI is also conducting a market conduct examination of State Farm for its handling of claims from the wildfires in Los Angeles. The examination will assess whether State Farm complied with California’s consumer protection and claims handling laws, according to Lara.
The CDI said it has received general allegations from wildfire survivor groups regarding State Farm’s processing of claims. One area of concern relates to how some insurers, including State Farm, are handling smoke damage claims, according to the CDI.
Related: Viewpoint: Smoke Damage from LA Wildfires Leaves Questions to Be Answered
Lara’s legal action against the FAIR Plan cites violations of California Insurance Code section 790.03 including:
- Misrepresenting policy terms
- Failing to investigate claims fairly
- Denying legitimate claims without reasonable basis
Lara and the CDI recently created a Smoke Claims & Remediation Task Force to develop statewide standards for investigating and remediating smoke damage.
- Car Owners Shocked by $200 Gas Bills Finally Embrace Used EVs
- The Future of Appraisal and the Rising Standard of Competency
- Ex-Shield AI Worker Sues Over ‘Profane, Egregious’ Acts by Senior Official
- The Iran War Is Pushing the Global Gas Trade into the Shadows
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference
- The Adjuster’s Year Ahead: What AI Will and Won’t Change About the Job
- JPMorgan Denies Ex-VP’s Viral Harassment Claims in Court Filing
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco