Coinbase Now Faces Narrowed Shareholder Lawsuit
In a Tuesday night decision, U.S. District Judge Brian Martinotti in Newark, New Jersey rejected requests by Coinbase, top executives and directors for a full dismissal of claims based on dozens of statements made over two years in regulatory filings, earnings calls, blog posts and tweets.
Shareholders said Coinbase defrauded them into believing it was improbable the SEC would accuse it in court of operating an unregistered securities exchange, and misrepresented the risk they could lose assets if Coinbase filed for bankruptcy.
Martinotti said shareholders cannot pursue claims based solely on “group pleading,” where statements in group-published documents such as press releases do not suggest any particular defendant intended to commit fraud.
“Where plaintiffs have appropriately provided defendant-by-defendant particularity, the claims must remain,” he added.
Martinotti’s 59-page decision does not say which statements he dismissed, because the parties did not identify which may involve group pleading. “Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs,” the judge said in a footnote.
In a statement, Coinbase called the decision a “significant step forward,” and said it is committed to vigorously defending against any remaining claims.
Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Coinbase’s share price fell 12% on June 6, 2023 after the SEC sued the company for allowing trading in tokens that the regulator said should have been registered as securities.
Shares also fell more than 26% on May 11, 2022 after Coinbase added disclosures and reported a larger-than-expected revenue decline.
The proposed class action led by Swedish pension fund Sjunde AP-Fonden covers Coinbase shareholders from April 14, 2021 to June 5, 2023.
In February, the SEC ended its lawsuit against Coinbase, as the Trump administration eases regulatory oversight of the cryptocurrency industry.
The case is In re Coinbase Global Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey, No. 22-04915.
(Reporting by Stempel in New York, Editing by Franklin Paul and Diane Craft)
- Product-Defect Presumption Lives On: Florida Appeals Court Upholds $103M vs. Ford
- Humans, Not AI, Still A Cause of Most Cyber Losses in First Half of Year
- Allstate Introduces Large Language Model, ALLIE
- Arson Suspect Timed Spokane Fire for High Wind Day
- AI Is Reshaping Insurance: What Claims Pros and Lawyers Must Know Now
- Ex-Red Lobster Owner Says in Lawsuit Defense That Endless Shrimp Not Its Idea
- Bodily Injury Is Now A Big Share of Auto Claims Payouts. Is AI to Blame for That Too?
- Insurer Interest in AI Exclusions Growing as Risk Becomes Omnipresent