FedEx Customers Suing for Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling
The proposed class action in the federal court in Miami, Florida, seeks compensation for potentially millions of shippers who paid import duties and related fees on products that they said should have entered the United States duty-free.
FedEx said in a statement on Friday: “If refunds are issued to FedEx, we will issue refunds to the shippers and consumers who originally bore those charges.”
Friday’s lawsuit said FedEx’s promise was not legally enforceable. “Our goal is to return to American consumers every penny they were improperly charged,” said John Yanchunis, a lawyer for plaintiff Matthew Reiser, a Miami resident.
FedEx is among at least 2,000 companies already suing the federal government in the U.S. Court of International Trade to recover tariffs they paid on imported goods under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on February 20 in a 6-3 decision that Trump overstepped his authority by using the emergency powers law to impose sweeping tariffs.
Reiser, the plaintiff in Friday’s lawsuit, said FedEx billed him $36 – $21 in IEEPA duties and $15 in brokerage and clearance fees – for his purchase of tennis shoes from a German retailer. The lawsuit said no duty should have been required.
On Friday, toymaker Hasbro joined the thousands of companies suing the government for tariff refunds in the U.S. Court of International Trade. French beauty group L’Oreal, British vacuum manufacturer Dyson and contact lens maker Bausch + Lomb also have filed lawsuits, in addition to retailers such as Costco and J. Crew.
(Reporting by Scarcella; Editing by David Bario and Ethan Smith)
- Ex-Shield AI Worker Sues Over ‘Profane, Egregious’ Acts by Senior Official
- Car Owners Shocked by $200 Gas Bills Finally Embrace Used EVs
- Report: Extreme Weather to Drive $20 Trillion in Spending
- Merck to Settle Bulk of Gardasil Suits for About $50 Million
- CommScope Sued by Lenders for at Least $150 Million Over Alleged Breach
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- Jefferies Sued by Fund Investors Alleging Water Firm Fraud
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference