Starbucks Sued Over ‘Sugar-Free’ Claims for Protein Beverages
Related: Starbucks Settles Florida Lawsuit Claiming Diversity Policies Were Illegal
- According to a proposed class action filed on Friday, reasonable consumers would not expect the beverages to contain 13 to 21 grams of sugar per 20- or 24-ounce “venti” serving.
- Federal law prohibits Starbucks from using “sugar-free” to describe beverages containing more than 0.5 grams of sugar per 12-ounce serving, the complaint said.
- Consumers accused Starbucks of trying to capitalize on the desire of 75% of Americans to reduce or eliminate sugar consumption. They also said Starbucks failed to provide federally required disclaimers that the protein beverages are not low-calorie food or meant for weight control.
- Starbucks, based in Seattle, had no immediate comment on Monday. A lawyer for the consumers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The complaint in Seattle federal court seeks unspecified damages for false advertising and violations of various state consumer protection laws.
- Food producers are regularly sued for alleged false advertising, including in dozens of recent cases challenging “sugar-free” or “zero sugar” claims for products containing a sugar substitute known as allulose.
- The eight Starbucks beverages are Sugar-Free Vanilla Protein Latte, Sugar-Free Caramel Protein Latte, Sugar-Free Vanilla Protein Matcha, Sugar-Free Caramel Protein Matcha, and equivalent versions containing ice.
- The Starbucks website says the beverages are “protein-packed” with “no added sugar,” and venti servings contain between 270 and 340 calories. The company launched the beverages in September 2025 as part of its “Back to Starbucks” updated menu.
Related: Court Says Starbucks Dress Code Didn’t Violate Workers’ Labor Rights
(Reporting by Stempel in New York; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
Copyright 2026 Reuters. Click for restrictions.
Popular Today
- Slips, Trips And Falls: Why It’s Important to Get Ahead of An Incident
- FBI Investigating Hackers’ Claims of Stealing Employee Data
- Golden Gate Sued Over Insurer’s $2.2 Billion Capital Shortfall
- Agentic Intelligence for Claims Dominates New Tech Launches
Popular This Month
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Florida Bans Flock Cameras, License Plate Readers From State Roads
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country