Judge: Gulf Oil Spill Victims Can Seek Punitive Damage
A federal judge has ruled that plaintiffs can seek punitive damages in some claims related to the 2010 Gulf oil spill.
U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier’s ruling came in mass litigation related to thousands of claims over economic damages.
The judge dismissed claims filed under state law because they’re “pre-empted by maritime law.” He also dismissed some maritime claims that “don’t allege physical damage to a proprietary interest.”
Steve Herman, an attorney for plaintiffs, said the dismissal doesn’t mean cases are getting kicked out of court. Herman said most claimants adopted a master complaint alleging federal and maritime law violations that goes beyond the claims Barbier dismissed.
BP had no comment.
The lawsuits arose from the oil spill caused by the April 20, 2010, explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, which was working for BP.
- Before the Nuclear Verdict: Rethinking How Liability Claims Are Managed
- Will California’s New Smoke Claims Law Create a Recovery Bottleneck?
- HSBC Executive Strikes Back in Court Fight Over Poaching Claims
- Report: Property Claims Face Delays, Are Growing More Complex
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States
- Florida Bans Flock Cameras, License Plate Readers From State Roads
- Are We Training Claims Adjusters or Claims Processors?