Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Dismisses Third Party Payer Suit
In an opinion issued Tuesday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with eight other federal circuit courts of appeals holding that “third party payer” claims against the tobacco industry are too remote and should be dismissed.
The Perry case was brought by individual subscribers of Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) health insurance representing a proposed class of BCBS subscribers in Tennessee. These nonsmoking subscribers alleged that they paid higher insurance premiums because subscribers who were smokers with tobacco-related diseases drove up the costs that BCBS had to pay.
In dismissing the suit, 6th Circuit Judge R. Guy Cole Jr. agreed with the lower court that “these injuries are clearly indirect.”
Daniel Donahue, senior vice president and deputy general counsel for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, noted that every federal appellate court that has addressed this issue (the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th, D.C. circuits, and now the 6th) has confirmed that these types of cases are not legally appropriate.
In rejecting third-party-payer suits, courts have stated that if a claim for medical expenses exists, it must be brought, if at all, by the person who has the disease, not the hospital or insurance company that may pay a portion of the costs.
- Beyond the Claim: How Social Canvassing is Transforming Insurance Fraud Detection
- Work Safety Group Releases List of ‘Dirty Dozen’ Employers
- Jury Awards $80M to 3 Former Zurich NA Employees for Wrongful Termination
- DraftKings Sued Over ‘Risk-Free’ Bets That Were Anything But
- CoreLogic Report Probes Evolving Severe Convective Storm Risk Landscape
- California Chiropractor Sentenced to 54 Years for $150M Workers’ Comp Scheme
- Poll: Consumers OK with AI in P/C Insurance, but Not So Much for Claims and Underwriting
- California Sees Two More Property Insurers Withdraw From Market