Florida Supreme Court Gets Another Tobacco Question
An appellate court wants the Florida Supreme Court to resolve a question on punitive damages in cases involving sick smokers.
A 1st District Court of Appeal panel on Wednesday split 2-1 in affirming a trial judge’s refusal to allow punitive damages in an Alachua County case because fraud was not proven.
A jury ordered R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. to pay Lucille Soffer $2 million in compensatory damages for the death of her husband, Maurice Soffer, from lung cancer.
It’s one of some 8,000 cases under the umbrella of a 2006 Supreme Court decision. That ruling allows punitive damages for fraud but is silent on negligence and strict liability.
The justices are being asked if Mrs. Soffer and other plaintiffs also can obtain punitive damages under those two legal theories.
- First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
- Don’t Sweat the Heatwave, El Niño Is Cooking up Some Raucous Weather for California
- HSBC Executive Strikes Back in Court Fight Over Poaching Claims
- Anxiety Over Gas Prices Points to ‘Looming EV Comeback’ in US
- Apollo’s Rowan Blasts Regulators for Handling of Walter Insurers
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country