California High Court Rules Cover Charge Creates Potential Liability
California’s high court has ruled that hosts who charge admission to parties may be held legally responsible if a drunken underage guest is hurt or injures someone else.
The state Supreme Court said in the unanimous ruling Monday that a cover charge amounts to a sale of alcohol, and state law creates liability for those who sell alcohol to obviously intoxicated minors.
The case stems from a 2007 party organized by then-20-year-old Jessica Manosa at a rental home owned by her parents. Nineteen-year-old Andrew Ennabe died after being hit outside the home by a car driven by another man who had been asked to leave the gathering.
Ennabe’s family sought to hold Manosa liable for his death, through her parents and their homeowners insurance.
Manosa’s attorney declined to comment.
- Warren, Hawley Press Insurers Over Closed, Unpaid Claims
- Agentic Intelligence for Claims Dominates New Tech Launches
- Will California’s New Smoke Claims Law Create a Recovery Bottleneck?
- UIM Minimum Limits. A Coverage That May Not Pay?
- New Corgi, Liberate, VERVE Claims Tech. Do We Need New Acronyms?
- The Nation’s Insurance Laboratory: What Liability Trends in California Mean for the Rest of the Country
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Torrential Rain Brings Deadly Floods Back to East Coast of Spain