New Hampshire Judge Clears Way for Enhanced Damages in Drunk Driving Cases
A judge or jury in New Hampshire can decide whether to award enhanced damages to a man injured by a drunken driver, a state Superior Court judge has ruled.
Most states allow enhanced damages in civil lawsuits against drunken drivers, and “New Hampshire is out of step with most courts in this regard,” Judge Edward Fitzgerald ruled.
“The general consensus is that driving while intoxicated is an evil that should be restrained by the use of enhanced or punitive damages,” he wrote.
In past decisions, the state Supreme Court has said that enhanced penalties can’t be awarded just because a driver was drunk.
But Fitzgerald said the high court left the door open for enhanced damages if the plaintiff can show an intoxicated driver acted maliciously, wantonly or with reckless disregard for the lives of others.
Fitzgerald said he would allow Lincoln Hanscom and his wife, Carol, to make that argument in their Merrimack County Superior Court lawsuit against Linda O’Connell, who rear-ended Lincoln Hanscom’s car in March 2003.
O’Connell had asked Fitzgerald to dismiss the portion of their lawsuit seeking enhanced damages.
Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
- DraftKings Sued Over ‘Risk-Free’ Bets That Were Anything But
- Jury Awards $80M to 3 Former Zurich NA Employees for Wrongful Termination
- Supplemental Claims Don’t Need to Include Damage Estimates, Fed Appeals Court Says
- Beyond the Claim: How Social Canvassing is Transforming Insurance Fraud Detection