Man Arrested for Letting Son Drive Ferrari in India
Police on Monday arrested a man who allowed his 9-year-old son to drive his Ferrari in the southern Indian state of Kerala.
Mohammed Nisham was arrested on charges of endangering the life of a child and allowing a minor to drive, said Inspector Biju Kumar.
He was later released after posting bail of 5,000 rupees ($92), Kumar said.
Nisham’s wife filmed the boy driving the sports car on his ninth birthday two weeks ago with his 5-year-old brother in the passenger seat. The video was widely watched on YouTube and created an outrage across India, causing police to file charges.
India’s economic boom has created a class of super-rich, whose excesses are frequently in the news.
Police Inspector M.V. Verghese said the boy’s father, who has a thriving tobacco and real estate business, owns 18 cars worth an estimated $4 million.
Nisham turned himself in at a police station near the port city of Kochi, Kumar said.
Police have impounded the Ferrari, but it will be returned to him in a few days after police complete the paperwork for the case, police said.
The boy’s parents were unabashed. “I am proud of him. He’s been driving since he was 5,” said his mother, Amal Nisham.
She said the boy has also driven the family’s Lamborghini and Bentley and other cars.
“It was his ninth birthday, and since he was insisting for months, we allowed him to drive the Ferrari. He is a cautious and confident driver,” she told television channel NDTV.
“It’s not easy for a child to achieve such a feat at this young age,” she said.
- CSU Adjusts Atlantic Hurricane Season Forecast Due to Emerging El NiƱo
- Why Toyota RAV4s Are Suddenly the Most Coveted Used Cars in America
- IBM, AT&T Accused by Whistleblower of Covering Up Foreign Hacks
- BASF Warns Iran War Could Trigger Supply Chain Disruption for Carmakers
- Jefferies Sued by Fund Investors Alleging Water Firm Fraud
- PE Founder Constantino Ran Firm in ‘Drunken Haze,’ Ex-COO Says in Lawsuit
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco