Supreme Court Won’t Reduce Student’s Music Download Fine
The U.S. Supreme Court will not reduce the $675,000 verdict against a Boston University student who illegally downloaded 30 songs and shared them on the Internet.
The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Joel Tenenbaum, who was successfully sued by the Recording Industry Association of America for illegally sharing music on peer-to-peer networks. In 2009, a jury ordered Tenenbaum to pay $675,000, or $22,500 for each song he illegally downloaded and shared.
A federal judge called that unconstitutionally excessive, but the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the penalty at the request of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Brothers Records Inc. and other record labels represented by the RIAA.
Copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Today
- BASF Warns Iran War Could Trigger Supply Chain Disruption for Carmakers
- Judge Won’t Bend on $256M Defamation, RICO Verdict Against Human Rights Lawyer
- IBM, AT&T Accused by Whistleblower of Covering Up Foreign Hacks
- Merck to Settle Bulk of Gardasil Suits for About $50 Million
Popular This Month
- Insurance Attorneys Flip $1M Hail Claim into Nearly $2M Suit for Contractor Interference
- ‘Big Tobacco’ Moment for Cannabis: What Insurers Need to Know About Murray v. Cresco
- Revlon Fails to Ensure Some Products Are Safe, FDA Warns
- PE Founder Constantino Ran Firm in ‘Drunken Haze,’ Ex-COO Says in Lawsuit