5th Circuit Upholds Ruling in Katrina Damage Case
A federal appeals court upheld a judge’s ruling that dismissed an engineering firm from a lawsuit involving a Hurricane Katrina damage case.
David and Marilyn Aikens, of Pass Christian, Miss., appealed U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter Jr.’s ruling to dismiss Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. as a defendant in the Aikens’ lawsuit over their damage claim filed following the 2005 storm.
Senter ruled the Aikens failed to show that Houston, Texas-based Rimkus acted with gross negligence or malice.
In the ruling, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Senter’s decision.
In their lawsuit, the Aikens said a Rimkus engineer initially concluded Katrina’s winds were strong enough to destroy their home — a “very favorable” finding for the homeowners. But the couple claims a Rimkus team leader later revised the engineer’s report to “mollify the language,” so their claim could be denied by USAA Casualty Insurance Co.
A federal jury in Gulfport in January 2008 ordered USAA to pay an additional $64,000 to the Aikens for wind damage to their home and its contents during the Aug. 29, 2005, hurricane.
- Google Faces $3.2 Billion Damage Claims on Ad-Tech Monopoly
- FBI Investigating Hackers’ Claims of Stealing Employee Data
- UIM Minimum Limits. A Coverage That May Not Pay?
- Before the Nuclear Verdict: Rethinking How Liability Claims Are Managed
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Apollo’s Rowan Blasts Regulators for Handling of Walter Insurers
- Florida Bans Flock Cameras, License Plate Readers From State Roads
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States