Judge Tosses Insurance Company’s Lawsuit Against Robert De Niro
A California judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed against Robert De Niro by an insurance company that claimed he misrepresented his health for a movie role.
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. insured the film “Hide and Seek.” The company claimed the actor misrepresented his health when he wrote that he had never been diagnosed with or treated for prostate cancer.
According to court documents, De Niro was diagnosed with prostate cancer on Oct. 15, 2003, two days after he signed the medical certificate. De Niro underwent a prostate-gland biopsy on Oct. 10, 2003.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rolf M. Treu granted De Niro’s motion for summary judgment.
This ruling vindicates what we’ve said all along,” De Niro’s attorney Robyn Crowther said. “We are pleased that the court has found that Fireman’s Fund can’t sue Mr. De Niro for getting cancer.”
De Niro’s diagnosis and resulting treatment delayed the movie production. Fireman’s Fund paid Fox more than $1.8 million to cover the cost of the delay. The film was released in January 2005.
- Trump Team Targets Auto Mileage Rules He Blasted as ‘EV Mandate’
- US Faces Growing Crisis Over High Traffic Deaths, NTSB Chair Says
- Verisk: A Shift to More EVs on The Road Could Have Far-Reaching Impacts
- US High Court Declines Appeal, Upholds Coverage Ruling on Treated Wood