U.S. Supreme Court Rejects BP’s Request to Halt Oil Spill Payments
BP Plc must pay potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in claims after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to halt disputed payments stemming from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Rejecting a request from BP, the justices today said they wouldn’t put a hold on lower court rulings that require the oil company to begin making the payments, part of a $9.2 billion accord.
BP says some of the money would go to businesses whose losses were unrelated to the spill, including lawyers who lost their licenses and warehouses that burned down before the spill.
The company says the process violates the Constitution and the federal rules that govern class action litigation.
Under its normal scheduling practices, the high court will decide late this year whether to take up BP’s appeal.
BP settled with most private-party plaintiffs in 2012, initially estimating the cost of the agreement at $7.8 billion. The company contends that a flawed interpretation by the claims administrator helped raise the price to $9.2 billion or more.
Lawyers for spill victims say BP is trying to renege on a settlement that is proving more costly than anticipated.
The case is BP Exploration v. Lake Eugenie Land, 13A1177.
- Will California’s New Smoke Claims Law Create a Recovery Bottleneck?
- Warren, Hawley Press Insurers Over Closed, Unpaid Claims
- First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
- Anxiety Over Gas Prices Points to ‘Looming EV Comeback’ in US
- The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
- Florida Bans Flock Cameras, License Plate Readers From State Roads
- New Corgi, Liberate, VERVE Claims Tech. Do We Need New Acronyms?
- Credit Acceptance Reaches $710M Predatory Auto Lending Settlement With Most States